Register
Sign In
Help
Sitemap
Home
Skip Navigation
Contact Us
Disability Statement
Site
Web
Search
Home
News
Sport
Community
Your say
Newspaper
Health Info
Money
enhanced by
You need to have javascript enabled to view this page correctly
Thursday, 11th March 2010
What's this?
The article has been unable to display.
Bookmark:
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
reddit
StumbleUpon
Prev
1
Next
1
emanuel buchan,
belem 10/11/2009 12:12:25
i wish you all good luck,,,polution this close to peterhead,is very bad,,,there are plenty sites between peterhead and ratray head... a long way from any houses or people..
Report Unsuitable
2
emanuel buchan,
belem 11/11/2009 11:34:58
had nightmares last night,,thinking about the buchaners,i seen the big chimneys belching out the smoke, and all the little particles of deadly viruses and bacterias falling down on the blue toon,which turned a dirty grey,,,,someone can make a lot of money by opening a surgical mask factory....
Report Unsuitable
3
Michael Ryan,
Shrewsbury 12/11/2009 16:41:46
The London Borough of Southwark is sandwiched between two incinerators - the municipal SELCHP one in Lewisham and also the one at Kings College Hospital.
The recent SEPA report on health effects of incineration has several pages referring to the Japanese study of 2004 which found elevated rates of infant deaths around 63 incinerators (J Epidemiol. 2004 May;14(3):83-93. Risk of adverse reproductive outcomes associated with proximity to municipal solid waste incinerators with high dioxin emission levels in Japan.).
It's unfortunate for Peterhead residents that SEPA haven't bothered to find out the 2008 infant mortality rates in London Boroughs as Southwark is "top of the league" again after also having the highest infant death rate in London in 2007.
Lewisham had the 2nd-highest infant death rate out of 32 London Boroughs in 2008 and Lambeth the 5th-highest.
Kingston upon Thames had the lowest rate and being free from incinerator emissions had an infant death rate of 0.9 per 1,000 live births while Southwark's rate was nearly eight-times greater at 7.0 per 1,000.
More on incinerators at www.ukhr.org
Kind regards,
Michael Ryan,
Shrewsbury
Report Unsuitable
Prev
1
Next
Comment on this Story
In order to post comments you must
Register
or
Sign In
RSS Feed of this article's comments
Delivery formats:
RSS, Atom, Javascript & Email
Email a friend
Print article
Increase text size
Decrease text size
3 comments on this article
More News
Radioactive material concerns voiced
SITA serves up ace cash for tennis club
End of an era
Landslip fears at Boddam
Jailed for scarring drinking pal for life
Buchan Queen nominations sought
Pitfour pupils 'bag' cash for eco project
Fundraiser for Angelman sufferer Kieran
Problem car-park 'not ours' says council
Ardallie residents 'wheelie' annoyed as bin lorries banned from their road
Young eggheads shine in Rotary Club quiz
Longhaven Pipe Band on the march for new members
Woman's body found at Cruden Bay
Town hosts business roadshow
OAP is forced to flee the floods
More News >>